Maryland

  Intellectual Property Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
January 30, 2012
Intellectual-Property
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Intellectual Property News

 

ITC Institutes Investigation On Certain Lighting Control Devices

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches. The products at issue in this investigation are devices for controlling light and its intensity.

The investigation is based on a complaint filed by Lutron Electronics Co. of Coopersburg, PA, on March 2, 2007. An amended complaint was filed on March 19, 2007. The amended complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches that infringe patents owned by Lutron. The complainant requests that the ITC issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order.

The ITC has identified Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc., of Little Neck, NY, and Control4 of Salt Lake City, UT, as the respondents in this investigation.

By instituting this investigation (337-TA-599), the ITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The case will be referred to the Honorable Robert L. Barton, an ITC administrative law judge, who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. Judge Barton will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

The ITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the ITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. ITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.

Contact our Maryland Intellectual Property Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Small businesses lack idea theft prevention.
U.S. small businesses may lack the knowledge, expertise or resources necessary to prevent the theft of their ideas and products.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Intellectual Property cases in Maryland and nationwide:

It’s Time to Shore Up Security
Some words to the wise: if you have a wireless Internet or network connection, make sure you’ve got the best possible security measures in place. A...
Read more >


North Carolina Man Charged With Illegally Accessing American College Of Physicians Database
PHILADELPHIA -- United States Attorney Pat Meehan today announced the return of an indictment (1) charging William Bailey, Jr. of Charlotte, NC, wi...
Read more >


Russian Intellectual Property Violations Must Be Addressed
Representatives Tom Lantos (D-CA-12), Ranking Member of the House International Relations Committee, and Darrell Issa (R-CA-49) also signed the let...
Read more >


More Intellectual Property News >

 
 

Intellectual Property Terms

 


Today's Terms

Publication

Definition:
The distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public.

Patent Pending

Definition:
A phrase that often appears on manufactured items. It means that someone has applied for a patent on an invention that is contained in the manufactured item.

Innovation

Definition:
Generation of new or improved products, processes, and services.

More Intellectual Property Terms >

 

Intellect. Property Resources

 


Search Intellectual Property resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Intellectual Property Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Intellectual Property:

  • Copyright Issues
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Unfair Competition Concerns
  • Right of Publicity Questions
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Patent Corporation Treaty

More Intellectual Property Topics >

Maryland Intellectual-Property Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Intellectual-Property attorney you should contact our Intellectual-Property Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Annapolis
  • Baltimore
  • Capitol Heights
  • Catonsville
  • Columbia
  • Cumberland
  • District Heights
  • Dundalk
  • Elkton
  • Ellicott City
  • Essex
  • Fort Washington
  • Gaithersburg
  • Germantown
  • Glen Burnie
  • Gwynn Oak
  • Hagerstown
  • Hyattsville
  • Lanham
  • Lutherville Timonium
  • Middle River
  • Nottingham
  • Owings Mills
  • Parkville
  • Pasadena
  • Potomac
  • Rockville
  • Silver Spring
  • Sykesville
  • Temple Hills
  • Upper Marlboro
  • Westminster
s
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Maryland Intellectual Property Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.